The Lordship Controversy occurred in the last two decades of the twentieth century. It was a debate largely between dispensational theologians regarding the nature of salvation and the place of repentance in the life of true believers. On one side of the Lordship Controversy was a company of “Free Grace” theologians who denied that repentance and obedience are necessary in the Christian life. On the other side of the controversy was a group of Calvinistic theologians who taught that although salvation is based only on God’s sovereign grace, God requires the evangelical response of repentance and faith in our reception of the gospel.
The latter emphasized the importance of the lordship of Christ in reaction to the denial of the need for repentance and the fruit of obedience in the teaching of the proponents of the Free Grace movement. By undermining the place of repentance and good works in the life of a believer, proponents of the Free Grace movement essentially advanced an antinomian view of justification. Although there was enough uniformity on each side of the debate to label these two different positions, there were also nuances in the way in which individual figures articulated the dynamics of both the Free Grace and the Lordship Salvation approach to the doctrine of salvation.
