Showing posts with label Baptism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Baptism. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 18, 2025

Bill Roach on Acts 22:16

In this video, Bill Roach addresses whether or not Acts 22:16 teaches baptismal regeneration.

Friday, January 3, 2025

A Discussion of the Issues Surrounding Paedobaptism

Yeah, post this might get me in trouble with my Paedobaptist brethren, but here it goes. Over at The Conquering Truth podcast, there is good discussion on the problems with baptizing infants.


Recommended Reading:

The Fatal Flaw of the Theology Behind Infant Baptism by Jeffrey Johnson

The Baptism of Disciples Alone by Fred Malone

Thursday, April 4, 2024

Book Review: The Complete Works of John Owen, Vol. 28: The Church, The Scriptures, and The Sacraments


Have you ever written to a famous person? When I younger, I wrote to Wil Wheaton who played Wesley Crusher on "Star Trek: The Next Generation." It was an assignment for school though I do not recall why this particular one was given to our class. I remember asking him some questions although I do not recall what I ask. I remember he wrote back and he did what celebrities do, he sent me a photo of himself. I did make an A on the assignment, which was one of the few things I got right as an 11-year-old. 

Have you ever written to a pastor or theologian to get his perspective on certain issues? I cannot recall but I know I asked a few on Twitter (now called X), but back in the day of John Owen, I am sure he got a lot of letters from people asking him questions.

In The Complete Works of John Owen, Vol 28: The Church, The Scriptures, and The Sacraments, Owen answers some questions given to him by specific people regarding topics surrounding the church, the Bible, the Lord's Supper, and Baptism. The first section deals with questions regarding the Bible. How the Bible came and the integrity of the scriptures.

The next sections address the Lord's Supper. Owen addresses the object of faith for the ordinance, the necessary preparation for observing the Lord's Supper, our duty to remember Christ's sufferings, and more. The final sections deal with how the church is supposed to work. Owen with topics such as church discipline and baptism. With baptism, Owen follow the Paedobaptism model which is followed by those in the Presbyterian church. 

Another great addition to this collection of John Owen's works. 

I received this book from Crossway in exchange for an honest review.

Monday, September 7, 2020

Sproul and MacArthur Debate on Baptism

The issue of Baptism has always been one of great debate in Reformed Theology. Should we baptize the children of believers or are believers only to be baptized? There have been a number of debates on this issue and I am not counting the ones on Twitter. Perhaps the one debate that is always recommended by Paedobaptists and Credobaptists alike is the one that took place between R.C. Sproul and John MacArthur. Not sure when this debate took place, but this one is a very clear discussion regardless of where you are on this topic.

The first video is the Paedobaptist position from R.C. Sproul and the next is the credobaptist position by John MacArthur (audio only):




Recommended Resources: 

Water Baptism from Sola Cast



Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Thursday, February 13, 2020

Baptism Symbolizes Our Union with Christ

Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, who has gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God, with angels, authorities, and powers having been subjected to him (1 Peter 3:21-22).

The grammar in the opening of verse 21 is difficult. To simplify, we should probably understand it in this way: “which (water) now also saves you, (who) are the antitype (of Noah and his family)—(that is) baptism.” In other words, the experience of Noah and his family in the flood is the type of which Peter’s audience and their baptism is the antitype (antitypon). (R.T.)France is especially helpful here:

The essential principle of New Testament typology is that God works according to a regular pattern, so that what he has done in the past, as recorded in the Old Testament, can be expected to find its counterpart in his work in the decisive period of the New Testament. Thus persons, events and institutions of the Old Testament, which in themselves need have no forward reference, are cited as ‘types’, models of corresponding persons, events and institutions in the life of Christ and the Christian church. On this principle, then, . . . Peter takes the salvation of Noah in the flood as a model of the Christian’s salvation through baptism.

Peter immediately qualifies the sense in which baptism saves us: it is not by the physical action itself, in which dirt is removed from the body. In other words, the physical action of baptism has no intrinsic saving power. There is no mechanical relationship between being immersed in water and being forgiven. The only sense in which baptism saves, says Peter, is insofar as it provides the occasion for an “appeal to God for a good conscience.”

“Appeal” (ESV) is the translation of eperōtēma, which others render as “pledge.” If the former is accurate, the one being baptized “appeals” to God, on the basis of the death and resurrection of Christ (or more literally, “through” or “by means of,” if dia is instrumental; cf. 1:3), to cleanse one’s conscience and forgive one’s sins. In good faith or conscience we appeal to God for vindication, that we might be considered part of his victory won by Christ in the resurrection (3:21b). It is only in this light that God uses the water of baptism to save us—as it links us to Christ and his victory and promises.

The focus of verse 22 (based on the language of Ps. 110:1; cf. Acts 2:33; 5:31; Rom. 8:34; Col. 3:1; Heb. 1:3, 13; 10:12; 12:2) is the exaltation and ascension of the risen Savior, which signifies his complete subjugation of all fallen and rebellious demonic powers. “Angels, authorities, and powers” is standard NT language for the fallen demonic hosts (Rom. 8:38–39; 1 Cor. 15:24–27; Eph. 1:21; 3:10; 6:12; Col. 1:16; 2:10, 15). Their subjection to Christ is undoubtedly the content of his proclamation (1 Pet. 3:19)…By being baptized they are marked out as God’s chosen few, who, like Noah and his family, will be saved even when all those around them mock and slander them. Baptism is the symbol of their being united with Christ in his resurrection, as well as his defeat of the demonic hosts. Consequently, your baptism is the reminder of the victory in which you stand, the victory that Christ achieved by his death and resurrection and exaltation above all principalities and powers.

Adapted from ESV Expository Commentary: Hebrews-Revelation

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

Baptism is a Sign of Grace

Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, who has gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God, with angels, authorities, and powers having been subjected to him (1 Peter 3:21-22).

It is not the physical cleansing of water on the body in baptism that “saves,” but the appeal in faith to God for the cleansing of conscience. We are saved by grace received through faith; our salvation is not the result of works (Eph. 2:8–9).

Baptism is a tangible sign of the grace that brings us through the spiritual perils of this life, just as Noah’s family was brought through water to be saved by God’s mercy (1 Pet. 3:20–21). God delights to give this sign to those in his church who put their faith in the death and resurrection of Jesus as the means of washing away sins and purifying believers for God. When a church administers baptism, it indicates God’s pledge that the promises of grace secured by the risen Lord will apply when the condition of faith is met; the act does not accomplish salvation but rather indicates what God accomplishes through faith.

For the believers in Peter’s time, the significance of this pledge was the knowledge that they were made eternally secure by Christ’s work on their behalf. Faith linked them to the powerful working of Christ at God’s right hand, regardless of the trials and difficulties they faced in the world (v. 22). These same assurances secured by faith are indicated by our baptisms today.

Adapted from the ESV Gospel Transformation Study Bible

Friday, February 1, 2019

Book Review: Baptism: Answers to Common Questions by Guy M. Richard

Baptism seems to be a hot topic and a heated debate between Baptists and Presbyterians. Some people felt they need to avoid the conversation altogether because it has resulted in name-calling and even broke relationship. You want to see some nasty debates, just check out Twitter some times.

I have read a few Baptism books over the years from both sides of the issue. Granted they are not heated debated, but they are a few I can walk away from that has not changed my view that Baptism is meant for believers only as the Bible clearly demonstrates. You may not agree with that, but it does not mean we cannot be brother and sisters just because we disagree. I know Guy M. Richard would say the same, which he did in his book on Baptism.

He expressed in the book that Baptism is and should be a family discussion. Yes, we will have different opinions on the matter, but that does not mean we should break fellowship because of it. He expressed that Reformed Baptists are still brothers and sisters in the Lord even though they may not agree with the teaching on Infant Baptism.

In this book, he shows us why he along with many Presbyterians why they believe the children of believers should be baptized. He reasons were clear and discussed in a manner where you did not feel like the enemy if you hold to Believer's Baptism. Richard does address why Baptists do not believer infants should be baptized and other difference we have in this issue.

This book is one that I would recommend to everyone (Baptists and Presbyterians) to read and have a healthy discussion on Baptism. I love that Richard was gracious to Baptists and understood where we are coming from on Baptism without resorting to backbiting. Has he changed my mind on Baptism? No, but I did appreciate what he wrote overall.

Thanks Reformation Trust for letting me review this book.

Wednesday, October 17, 2018

Wednesday, August 29, 2018

Book Review: It Takes A Church To Baptize by Scot McKnight

Baptism is a hot topic. If you have been on Twitter for a while, depending on who you follow, you know it to be true. Baptists have always given the defense for Believer's Baptism while other denominations have argued that infants of believing parents should be baptized.

There have been a number of books and articles written on both sides giving their reasons for why their mode of baptism is more Biblically accurate than the other. One such person is Scot McKnight, who believes that infant baptism is Biblical than what Baptists believe. He gives a general defense of infant baptism hoping to clear the minds of those doubting it in his latest book, It Takes a Church to Baptize: What the Bible Says about Infant Baptism.

McKnight states what led him to embrace infant baptism was the Bible, which is why he says the Bible gives a stellar defense for infant baptism. One thing he also stresses is that baptizing apart from the family, meaning the family of God, violates what baptism is all about. McKnight, an Anglican minister, goes through various passages to show support for infant baptism which are the same verses you hear from Presbyterians. He goes on to say baptism is not the gospel but the gospel is presented in baptism, which sounds more credo (Believer's Baptism) than paedo (Infant Baptism). McKnight writes that baptism is a public act pronouncing that God has done something for us, to which I say Amen as a credo Baptist. Keep in mind, this is a book about infant baptism.

McKnight digs into church history to show that infant baptism has been around for a long time. While that is true, I recall a statement from John Calvin that said the church in the beginning baptized by immersion and Calvin was a paedo Baptist. Church history can also show us that the earliest forms of paedo baptism took was in the 4th century while the earliest documents of church history shows us that credo baptism was the primary mode in the 3rd century. Of course, McKnight tries to point out that circumcision and baptism are the same which they are clearly not. Circumcision for Israel was to set them apart as a nation from the other nations. Baptism is our declaration of what Christ has done for us and we have been adopted into the family of God, which is based the finished work of Christ. Yes, the church is called a holy nation, but we are nation of different people groups, not one particular nation.

McKnight does say that baptism should be a family affair. Not just the child's family but the whole church. According to him, Anglicans made a big deal of baptism. I do agree that baptism needs to be a family affair where the church celebrates those who profess Christ as they pronounce the work of Christ in their lives.

McKnight points out that baptism reflects our union of Christ, which again sounds more like Believer's Baptism than Infant Baptism. If a baby has union with Christ before he/she professes faith, does that mean the baby is saved upon baptism? This is something Anglicans and Presbyterians would say no, but still does not make a lot of sense.

McKnight does make a compelling argument for Infant Baptism, but not a convincing one. Too many inconsistencies in the book regarding what Anglicans believe about Baptism. There were times that made you wonder if he was defending credo or paedo baptism. There were also times when I felt he was making infant baptism a primary issue more than a secondary issue. Meaning that infant baptism must be practice in the church or it is an affront to the gospel. Granted, baptism is an important doctrine and practice, but the mode, to most paedo and credo Baptists, is more of a secondary issue.

Thanks Baker Publishing for letting me review this book.

Wednesday, May 30, 2018

Around The Web-May 30, 2018

Order Redeeming Money by Paul Tripp and get free shipping plus other deals on books by Tripp

C. S. Lewis on Corporate Worship by Joe Rigney

Believing Jesus by Matt Sliger

Doctrine and Devotion begin a new series on the 1689 Baptist Confession of faith with The 1689 on Scripture (1.1)

It’s Submission, Not Subjection by Tim Challies

The Sin That Clings So Closely by Garrett Kell

True Satisfaction Is in Jesus Alone by Justin Huffman

H.B. Charles, Jr on what baptism and the Lord's Supper symbolizes

ShareThis