Showing posts with label Translations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Translations. Show all posts

Friday, June 20, 2025

Why I made the Switch to the LSB

This is from my original post Switching to the LSB:

When it comes to Bible translations, this is something that I do not take very lightly. I do not switch when new translations come out, but when it came to the Legacy Standard Bible (LSB), it was almost an easy decision but still something that was not made overnight. Why did I make the switch? Here are my reasons.

First, it is a better update of NASB. When it was announced that the New American Standard Bible (NASB) was getting an update, I was excited because I love the NASB, but there was a lot of jargon in the translation. There were a few verses that were confusing that made it hard to read. However, I read the NASB 2020 and was disappointed they were going to the gender-neutral way of translating the Bible as other translations such as the New International Version (NIV) and Christian Standard Bible (CSB). The LSB is what the NASB 2020 should have been.

Second, it is a smoother read. Unlike the NASB, the LSB is a better read even though the translators focused more on what the author of the text said rather than focusing on how the readers is going to take it. 

Third, the use of Yahewh. In most translations, the Old Testament has God's covenant name, Yahewh, as LORD. God's name is not Lord. Lord is a title that we ascribe to God. Yahewh is His name. In Exodus, we see:

Then Moses said to God, “Behold, I am about to come to the sons of Israel, and I will say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you.’ And they will say to me, ‘What is His name?’ What shall I say to them?” 

And God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM”; and He said, “Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’”

And God furthermore said to Moses, “Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, ‘Yahweh, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is My name forever, and this is My memorial-name from generation to generation (Exodus 3:13-15).

In Psalm 110:1, we see God's covenant name and the Hebrew word for Lord, Adonai, used:

Yahweh says to my Lord: “Sit at My right hand Until I put Your enemies as a footstool for Your feet.”

In other translations, it would read, "The LORD said to my Lord," which reading it, it made no since especially when reading it out loud. Reading Psalm 110:1 in the LSB shows us that Yahewh is speaking to an earthly master. Yes, there was the Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB) that did use Yahewh in the Old Testament, but that translation is out of print and became the CSB. There is also the Lexham English Bible (LEB), which is a great translation to use for study, but it is not that accessible unless you have Logos or use Bible Gateway. 

Fourth, the use of doulos. The LSB uses the Greek word doulos as slave rather than servant or bondservant as other translations have used. I know in America; the word slave is not very appealing. If we understand how the word was used when the Greek New Testament was written, we would see that it is not referring to what most Americans think of slavery. We owe a debt to Christ for saving us from our sins which can never be repaid. We call Jesus our Master; therefore, we are His slaves. 

Fifth, the consistency. The LSB is a very consistent translation. It does not translate the text based on tradition. One place would be the model prayer. As Jesus concludes the prayer, most translations have it as "And lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil" (ESV). The LSB has it as this, "And do not lead us into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one." This is translated the same way in Matthew 5:37 and John 17:15. 

Finally, When I read the LSB, it gives me a greater desire to go in depth into the original languages of both testaments. I will admit, I am not a great Hebrew and Greek scholar, but I always want to see what the original word was when it written. As I read the LSB, I seek to see how it was translated. I compare it to other translations to see if it was the right way to translate it or not. One passage that comes to mind is Psalm 73:25-26. My pastor uses the ESV and made a reference to this passage which reads:

Whom have I in heaven but you?

And there is nothing on earth that I desire besides you.

My flesh and my heart may fail,

but God is the strength of my heart and my portion forever.

This is how the LSB translates this passage:

Whom have I in heaven but You?

And besides You, I desire nothing on earth.

My flesh and my heart fail,

But God is the rock of my heart and my portion forever.

Both translations read very similar except where most translations say, "God is the strength of my heart," it says in the LSB, "God is the rock of my heart." The original Hebrews refers to a rock, cliff, block of stone. So the word "rock" is a better translation than "strength." 

I highly recommend the LSB to any pastor and anyone that loves God's Word. 

Thursday, June 19, 2025

Is the LSB a money making Translation?

If you have followed me for some on social media and on this blog, you would know that I use the Legacy Standard Bible for the past few years. There have many that made the switch such as myself but there are others that think it is only here to make money.

In this video, Justin Peters interview Abner Chou and William Varner, two of the translators of the LSB. They are going to discuss how it came about and address if it is around only to make a profit.

Tuesday, January 21, 2025

Peter Goeman on the Best Translation for Deuteronomy 4:29

Peter Goeman on his YouTube channel, The Bible Sojourner, looks at the various English translations of Deuteronomy 4:29 and states which one is the best.

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

Book Review: The Second Testament by Scot McKnight


Scot McKnight teaches New Testament at Northern Seminary and has written many books including a few commentaries in the New Testament. His latest project is his translation of the New Testament simply titled, The Second Testament.

Before I go any further, I want to take time to address the different schools of thought in Bible translation. The first is the literal approach where the translators of the Bible attempt to translate the Bible from one language to another as word-for-word as they can. Translations that are considered literal are the New American Standard Bible, English Standard Bible, Legacy Standard Bible, King James Bible, and New King James Bible.

Next, we have the dynamic equivalence which looks more into what is the meaning of the text rather than the literal translation of that passage. Granted, some of these translations do take into account of the original language but they are guided by what they believe is the intent of the author. Some of those translations include the New International Version, Christian Standard Bible, and New Living Translation.

Finally, we have paraphrase. A Bible paraphrase is when one person translates the Bible. The most famous paraphrase is the Living Bible where Dr. Kenneth Taylor took the King James Version and translate it so his daughter can read the Bible without all of the complex words associated with the King James. What the translators of paraphrases attempt to do is make the Bible readable using words that are not associated with the original languages of the Bible. Other paraphrases include The Message and the problematic Passion Translation. 

Where does The Second Translation fit into these categories. After going through and knowing what the author was intending to do with this "translation," it is a paraphrase. This is a not a translation. Knowing that McKnight leans to a more liberal theology, I should not have been surprised. Plus, as mentioned earlier, a paraphrase is when one person translates the Bible and uses words not associated with the original languages of scripture. Therefore, I cannot call The Second Testament a translation.

I received this book from InterVarsity Press in exchange for a honest review.

ShareThis