Showing posts with label Tim Challies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tim Challies. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

AI and Systematic Theology

The following is from the article: AI is Coming for Your Systematic Theology by Tim Challies:

A recent article at The American Scholar asks Who Is Blake Whiting? Whiting appears to be the most prolific scholar of our age, sometimes publishing up to 13 books a week “on a host of complex archaeological and historical subjects, ranging from the collapse of Near Eastern civilizations in 1177 BCE to the recent discovery of a huge Silk Road–era city in Central Asia.” He must be quite the individual!

But as you no doubt guessed, he is not an individual at all. Rather, Blake Whiting is fabricated, and the books under his name have been generated using AI. Andrew Lawler, who wrote the article for The American Scholar, warns that, “His fake persona is harbinger of an alarming trend threatening disaster to academics and journalists alike.” And theologians, I would add, as well as those who read books by them. 

When I read Lawler’s article, I was already working on one of my own that addresses the same phenomenon, but from the perspective of a Christian reader. If you were to visit Amazon today and search for “systematic theology,” it would not take you long to find a host of similar works. Many of them have scads of enthusiastic reviews and feature realistic-sounding author bios that say things like, he “is a Christian author and teacher of systematic theology with a passion for making biblical doctrine clear, accessible, and meaningful for today’s readers.” Yet in reality, he does not exist at all, and the books under his name have been generated through nothing more than clever prompting of a Large Language Model.

I want you to know about these books because I want you to be aware that this is happening. I want you to know it’s happening because it’s likely that things will get far worse before they get any better. I’ll first introduce you to this slop theology, then discuss the threat these books represent, and then tell you how you can identify them.

Read the entire post here.

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Revelation or Revelations

Do you know someone that likes to put a "S" at the end of some things? I know quite of few of them. They like to say Wal-Marts when it is actually Wal-Mart. When I worked at Mardel years ago, lots of people kept calling it Mardel's which drove quite a few employees mad.

If you have been in church long enough, you would hear preaching refer the book of Revelation as Revelations. Some do not see why this is a big deal, but to be honest it is a big deal. Tim Challies recently addressed this and stressed why it is important we call the last book of the Bible Revelation and not Revelations:

It’s probably one of the most common and commonly-missed errors Christians make when speaking about the Bible—they call the final book of the Bible “Revelations” instead of “Revelation.” The difference is subtle—a single “s.” Yet that little letter, in its own way, changes the very nature of the book. It matters.

It matters because it’s crucial to a proper reading of any document to get the first word right. If we go around thinking Abraham Lincoln began the Gettysburg Address with “Fore score and seven years ago…” we might miss the connection he makes to the signing of the Declaration of Independence 87 years prior. We can’t just pluralize the book of Genesis and make it “Genesises” if we want to capture the fact that it describes the beginning rather than beginnings. We’d do damage to Peter’s Pentecost sermon if we changed the opening “men” to “man.” “Man of Judea and all who dwell in Jerusalem, let this be known to you, and give ear to my words…”

The book of Revelation takes its name from its opening word. That word is apokalypsis which is best translated as “revelation,” though it can also catch the senses of unveiling or disclosing. Crucially and obviously, it’s a singular, not plural, word. Translators also rightly add the definite article “the” to indicate this is “the revelation.” The is not an area of dispute; no translator begins with “the revelations.”


Read the entire post here

Thursday, October 19, 2017

What Is Wrong With Jesus Calling?

If you have been to a Christian bookstore or the Christian section at Wal-Mart, you might have seen a devotional book by Sarah Young called, Jesus Calling. Many have read the book. Some love it and others are saying stay away from it.

Now I have not read the book myself, but there are people in the blog community I trust that take time to read books and give their assessment of them. Tim Challes is one them. He has read many books over the years and has given his honest opinion about them. When it came to Jesus Calling, not only did he give his honest opinion, but he also stated what is wrong with the book. He lists 10 problems the book has:

1. She speaks for God. Far and away the most troubling aspect of the book is its very premise—that Sarah Young hears from Jesus and then dutifully brings his messages to her readers. Jesus Calling makes the boldest, gutsiest, and, to my mind, most arrogant claim of any book ever to be considered Christian. The publisher describes the book in this way: “After many years of writing her own words in her prayer journal, missionary Sarah Young decided to be more attentive to the Savior’s voice and begin listening for what He was saying. So with pen in hand, she embarked on a journey that forever changed her—and many others around the world. In these powerful pages are the words and Scriptures Jesus lovingly laid on her heart. Words of reassurance, comfort, and hope. Words that have made her increasingly aware of His presence and allowed her to enjoy His peace (italics mine).” There is no way to avoid her claim that she is communicating divine revelation, a claim that raises a host of questions and concerns, not the least of which is the doctrine of Scripture alone which assures us that the Bible and the Bible alone is sufficient to guide us in all matters of faith and practice.

2. She proclaims the insufficiency of the Bible. Jesus Calling only exists because Sarah Young had a deep desire to hear from God outside of the Bible. In the introduction she describes the book’s genesis: “I began to wonder if I … could receive messages during my times of communing with God. I had been writing in prayer journals for years, but that was one-way communication: I did all the talking. I knew that God communicated with me through the Bible, but I yearned for more. Increasingly, I wanted to hear what God had to say to me personally on a given day.” In those few sentences she sets up unnecessary competition between her revelation and what we are told of the Bible in 2 Timothy 3:16-17: “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.” Biblically, there is no category for what she provides as the heart and soul of her book. Biblically, there is no need for it and no reason we should expect or heed it.

3. Her deepest experience of God comes through a practice God does not endorse. Young does not only endorse her practice of listening, but goes so far as to elevate it as the chief spiritual discipline. “This practice of listening to God has increased my intimacy with Him more than any other spiritual discipline, so I want to share some of the messages I have received. In many parts of the world, Christians seem to be searching for a deeper experience of Jesus’ Presence and Peace. The messages that follow address that felt need.” Notice that her solution to addressing the desire for Jesus’ Presence and Peace is not Scripture or any other means of grace, but the very messages she provides in her book.

4. She is inspired by untrustworthy models. In early versions of Jesus Calling, Young tells of her discovery of the book God Calling and the way she modeled her practice of listening on it. She describes it as “a devotional book written by two anonymous ‘listeners.’ These women practiced waiting quietly in God’s Presence, pencils and paper in hand, recording the messages they received from Him. This little paperback became a treasure to me. It dove-tailed remarkably well with my longing to live in Jesus’ Presence.” It is worth noting that recent versions of Jesus Calling have been scrubbed of this information. God Calling is an equally troubling book that saw much success beginning in the 1930s and has seen a revival of interest in the wake of Jesus Calling. It is at times subbiblical and at other times patently unbiblical. And yet it is a book she regards as a treasure and a model for her own work.

5. She provides lesser revelation. Young admits that her revelation is different from the Bible’s (“The Bible is, of course, the only inerrant Word of God; my writings must be consistent with that unchanging standard”), but does not explain how her writings are different. Jesse Johnson says, “She does grant that the content of Jesus Calling should be measured against Scripture—but that is true of Scripture as well. In the end, there is no substantial difference in how Young expects us to view Jesus’ words to her, than how we are to view the Bible. I mean, Jesus’ words to Sarah are literally packaged into a devotional, so that we can do our devotionals from them every day.” If her words are actually from Jesus, how can they be any less authoritative or less binding than any word of Scripture?

6. She mimics occult practices. The way in which Young receives her revelation from Jesus smacks of the occult. “I decided to listen to God with pen in hand, writing down whatever I believe He was saying. I felt awkward the first time I tried this, but I received a message. It was short, biblical, and appropriate. It addressed topics that were current in my life: trust, fear, and closeness to God. I responded by writing in my prayer journal.” This is not a far cry from a practice known as “automatic writing” which Wikipedia describes as “an alleged psychic ability allowing a person to produce written words without consciously writing. The words are claimed to arise from a subconscious, spiritual or supernatural source.” Her inspiration was God Calling where it is even clearer that the authors allowed their minds to go blank at which point they supposedly received messages from God. This practice is very different from the giving of biblical revelation where God worked through the thoughts, personalities, and even research of the authors.

7. Her emphasis does not match the Bible’s. Young’s emphasis in Jesus Calling is markedly different from the emphases of the Bible. For example, she speaks seldom of sin and repentance and even less of Christ’s work on the cross. Michael Horton says, “In terms of content, the message is reducible to one point: Trust me more in daily dependence and you’ll enjoy my presence.” While this is not necessarily an unbiblical or inappropriate message, it hardly matches the thrust of the Bible which always pushes toward or flows from the gospel of Jesus Christ. Horton adds, “The first mention of Christ even dying for our sins appears on February 28 (page 61). The next reference (to wearing Christ’s robe) is August 9 (p. 232). Even the December readings focus on a general presence of Jesus in our hearts and daily lives, without anchoring it in Jesus’s person and work in history.”

8. Her tone does not match the Bible’s. It can’t be denied: The Jesus of Sarah Young sounds suspiciously like a twenty-first century, Western, middle-aged woman. If this is, indeed, Jesus speaking, we need to explain why he sounds so markedly different from the Jesus of the gospels or the Jesus of the book of Revelation. Nowhere in Scripture do we find Jesus (or his Father) speaking like this: “When your Joy in Me meets My Joy in you, there are fireworks of heavenly ecstasy.” Or again, “Wear my Love like a cloak of Light, covering you from head to toe.” And, “Bring me the sacrifice of your precious time. This creates sacred space around you—space permeated with My Presence and My Peace.” Why does Jesus suddenly speak in such different language?

9. She generates confusion. By fabricating the spiritual discipline of listening and elevating it to the first place, she generates confusion about the disciplines that God does prescribe for Christians. Michael Horton addresses this one well: “According to the Reformation stream of evangelicalism, God speaks to us in his Word (the arrow pointing down from God to us) and we speak to him in prayer (the arrow directed up to God). However, Jesus Calling confuses the direction of these arrows, blurring the distinction between God’s speech and our response.” What she models and endorses is both confusing and unhelpful.

10. Her book has been corrected. Most people don’t know that Jesus Calling has undergone revisions, not only in the introduction where she removed references to God Calling, but also in the words she claims to have received from Jesus. This, of course, casts even further doubt on the trustworthiness of the revelation she receives. After all, why would words from Jesus need to be revised? Did God lie? Did he change? Did she mis-hear him? There is no good option here, other than to doubt all she has ever claimed to receive.

If you want to know more about what Tim thinks of the book, check out his review here.

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Purity in a Digital World

Lets face it, the Internet and even Social Media can places where we see things that will make our grandparents blush. Truth be told it should make us blush. Men stumble across pornography, whether intentional or not, everyday.

Can Christians be pure when it comes to technology? Yes, they can. In this video, Tim Challies talks about being pure in a digitial world.




Books by Tim Challies:

The Next Story: Life and Faith after the Digital Explosion

Sexual Detox: A Guide for Guys who are Sick of Porn

Visual Theology: Seeing and Understanding the Truth about God

Do More Better: A Practical Guide to Productivity

The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment

Monday, April 25, 2016

Book Review: Visual Theology by Tim Challies with Josh Byers

If you are a regular visitor to Tim Challies' website, you have seen a few entries from time to time called Visual Theology. These are posters that address various topics such as The Trinity, The Order of Salvation, and Reformed Theology. Many have downloaded these images to put on their computer background or on their social media site.

Challies has now written a book that addresses theological issues with the help of artist Josh Byers, which is appropriately called, Visual Theology. What this book does is teach theology to its readers and get a visual aid to understand what is being addressed. You can call this book, "Systematic Theology with Pictures."

Challies writes about the gospel, what the Bible is, prayer, how to live the Christian life, and even stewardship. Challies writes in the simplest way so that all of his readers can understand what he is communicating. The pictures are great as well (not is not often I say that in a book review). One of my favorites is the one on the Bible, which looks like this:


The picture looks like the Periodic Table separating the Old and New Testaments. This is just one of the many images that are in this book.

Who should read this book? Every Christian for edification and being equipped. I think this book would be good for teenagers and even college students. This might be good for some kids to help them learn sound doctrine as they are getting away from children's Bibles.

Overall, this is an amazing book filled with sound theology and great artistry.

Thanks Booklook Bloggers for letting me review this book.

Friday, April 1, 2016

Around The Web-April 1, 2016

3 Ways the Spirit Works in Us by Darrin Patrick

A Right Fear by Dave Jenkins

5 Ways "God's Not Dead" Fails Christians by Chris Williams

A sale for the popular Pillar NT Commentary Series is happen till April 6th.

How to Uncheapen Grace in Your Church by Jared C Wilson

Has Ken Ham Embraced Evolution? by Tim Challies

Sam Allberry answers the question, can you be a Christian without going to church?



Fasten your seat belts from this one. The man, the myth, the legend Scott Sterling and his face return for a championship volleyball game.

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Purity in a Digital Age

Tim Challies delivers a much needed sermon in our day and time. This video is from session of the 2015 Ligonier National Conference.

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Best Book Lists from Other Bloggers

By now, many news agencies and websites have been releasing this best list of 2014. Many bloggers are doing the same thing with books. Since I am a book lover as well those who are bloggers as well, I thought I would take the time to share their lists for their favorite books of 2014:


Tim Challies

Aaron Armstrong

Kevin DeYoung

The Staff at The Gospel Coalition

Justin Buzzard

Tony Reinke

The Leadership of Servants of Grace

Brian G Hedges

In case you were wondering if I am making a best book list, rest assured. It's coming.

Monday, October 6, 2014

Why Study Doctrine?

Tim Challies:

I love doctrine. Doctrine is simply the teaching of God or the teaching about God—the body of knowledge that he reveals to us through the Bible. I guess I’m one of those geekly people who loves to learn a new word and the big idea behind it. But I hope I do not love doctrine for doctrine’s sake. Rather, I strive to be a person who loves doctrine for God’s sake.

Today I want to give you 6 great reasons to study doctrine.

DOCTRINE LEADS TO LOVE

DOCTRINE LEADS TO HUMILITY

DOCTRINE LEADS TO OBEDIENCE

DOCTRINE LEADS TO UNITY

DOCTRINE LEADS TO WORSHIP

DOCTRINE LEADS TO SAFETY

Read the entire post here.

Friday, September 12, 2014

Around the Web-September 12, 2014

Three Ways To Pray and Support Persecuted Christians by Dave Jenkins

Randy Alston shared what changes have been happening at his church

I have joined Tim Challies in reading (in my case rereading) John Owen's classic, The Mortification of Sin. Here are his summaries for Chapter 1 and Chapter 2. If you want read along with me and Tim, get the book get a copy of the book or you can get this one.

4 Ways to Apply Grace in Fight for Holiness by Steve Bezner

Jared C. Wilson on how should a pastor apply the finished work of Christ in his ministry.

A Conversation with Jared Wilson from MBTS on Vimeo.

Friday, May 9, 2014

Around The Web-May 9, 2014

“I Feel Super Great About Having an Abortion” — The Culture of Death Goes Viral by Albert Mohler

The Jesus Wife Fragment is a Hoax by Michael Horton

HGTV Cancels Show that Features Hosts with Biblical Worldview

Tim Challies reviews Ray Ortlund's latest book, The Gospel: How the Church Portrays the Beauty of Christ. Also, check out Jeff Medders' favorite quotes from the book.

Satanic group reveals crowdfunded monument for Oklahoma State Capitol

R-Rated Texts for an R-Rated World R-Rated Texts for an R-Rated World by Josh Vincent

Kevin Durant's acceptance speech that everyone is talking about.



This has to be the worst failure in the history of Family Feud. Please note: the audio quality is not that good so you might need to turn up the volume.

Friday, May 2, 2014

Around The Web-May 2, 2014

Giving CASH At Your Church Staff Meetings by Nick Nye

The Least Sung Song by Tim Challies

Tennessee will criminalize moms who use drugs during pregnancy

Catechisms for Kingdom Warfare by Jeff Medders

This video featuring Matt Chandler and his wife, Lauren was on Desiring God this past week as they discussed the hurtles they have faced in their marriage.



Here is the trailer to Brian Hedges' next book, Active Spirituality.

Active Spirituality: Grace and Effort in the Christian Life from Brian Hedges on Vimeo.

Friday, April 4, 2014

Around The Web-April 4, 2014

Christian Celebrity and the Conference Culture by Tim Challies

What Reformed Theology is Not by R.C. Sproul

Kevin DeYoung's new book, Taking God At His Word, is on sale for $10.00, but if you buy 5 or more, the cost will be $8.00.

Millennials and the false 'gospel of nice' by Daniel Darling

CEO of Firefox maker Mozilla steps down because of his contribution to Proposition 8 in 2008

Late Night talk show host David Letterman announces his retirement.

Friday, November 22, 2013

Around The Web-November 22, 2013

If you are looking to preach from your iPad, Tim Challies has 10 steps on preaching from it

Methodist Pastor gets a 30 day suspension for officiating in son's gay wedding

3 Common Ways To Read Scripture by Matt Smethurst

Today not only marks the 50th anniversary of JFK's assassination, but it also marks the 50th anniversary of the death of C.S. Lewis. Joe Carter has written 9 things you should know about him.

The Gospel: An "It" or a "He"? by Marcus Johnson

ShareThis